IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v86y2004i4p919-932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marginal Property Tax Effects of Conservation Easements: A Vermont Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan R. King
  • Christopher M. Anderson

Abstract

Conservation easements allow landowners to transfer their land's development rights to another entity, usually a nontaxable conservation organization. Conservation reduces the town's tax base, necessitating a tax rate increase to maintain service levels. However, conserving land also decreases the supply of developable land and provides open space amenities that may be capitalized into the value of nearby properties. These effects may offset the decrease in the tax base caused by the easement. Using a sample of twenty-nine Vermont towns, we show that private conservation easements increase property tax rates in the short run, but are tax-neutral or tax-suppressing in the long run. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan R. King & Christopher M. Anderson, 2004. "Marginal Property Tax Effects of Conservation Easements: A Vermont Case Study," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(4), pages 919-932.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:86:y:2004:i:4:p:919-932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00643.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kathryn Anderson & Diana Weinhold, 2005. "Do Conservation Easements Reduce Land Prices? The Case of South Central Wisconsin," Urban/Regional 0506001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Yanay Farja, 2017. "Price and distributional effects of privately provided open space in urban areas," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 543-557, July.
    3. John F. Chamblee & Peter F. Colwell & Carolyn A. Dehring & Craig A. Depken, 2011. "The Effect of Conservation Activity on Surrounding Land Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(3), pages 453-472.
    4. Zhang, Weiyi & Mei, Bin & Izlar, Robert L., 2018. "Impact of forest-related conservation easements on contiguous and surrounding property values," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 30-35.
    5. Kalinin, Alexey V. & Sims, Katharine R.E. & Meyer, Spencer R. & Thompson, Jonathan R., 2023. "Does land conservation raise property taxes? Evidence from New England cities and towns," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Edmund M. Balsdon, 2012. "Property Value Capitalization and Municipal Open Space Referenda," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(2), pages 201-232.
    7. Welsh, Rick & Webb, Michaele E. & Langen, Tom A., 2018. "Factors affecting landowner enrollment in wetland restoration in northeastern New York State," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 679-685.
    8. Harpankar, Kshama & Taff, Steven J., 2004. "Tracking the Effects of Conservation Easements on Property Tax Valuations," Staff Papers 13493, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Vercammen, James, 2014. "The Welfare Impacts of a Conservation Easement," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169813, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Karen A. Sullivan, 2017. "Brownfields Remediation: Impact on Local Residential Property Tax Revenue," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:86:y:2004:i:4:p:919-932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.