IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v73y1991i2p255-265..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rent Seeking: The Potash Dispute between Canada and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Valerie J. Picketts
  • Andrew Schmitz
  • Troy G. Schmitz

Abstract

Despite the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement, border disputes involving agricultural trade are common. A theoretical basis for the 1987 U.S. countervailing duty case against Canadian exports of potash is developed using excess capacity arguments. Empirically, within a rent-seeking context, the U.S. potash producers gained far less from their legal action against Canada than did U.S. farmers who are significant users of Canadian potash.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerie J. Picketts & Andrew Schmitz & Troy G. Schmitz, 1991. "Rent Seeking: The Potash Dispute between Canada and the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(2), pages 255-265.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:73:y:1991:i:2:p:255-265.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1242710
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yves Jégourel, 2016. "Potash: a typical price war," Research papers & Policy papers on Economic Trends and Policies 1603, Policy Center for the New South.
    2. Javelosa, Josyline C. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2006. "Costs and Benefits of a WTO Dispute: Philippine Bananas and the Australian Market," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26.
    3. Troy G. Schmitz, 2018. "Impact of the 2014 Suspension Agreement on sugar between the United States and Mexico," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(1), pages 55-69, January.
    4. Schmitz, Troy G. & Lewis, Karen E., 2015. "Impact of NAFTA on U.S. and Mexican Sugar Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Yves Jégourel, 2016. "Potash: a typical price war," Policy briefs on Economic Trends and Policies 1603, Policy Center for the New South.
    6. Yves Jégourel, 2016. "Potash: a typical price war," Research papers & Policy papers on Trade Dynamics and Policies 1602, Policy Center for the New South.
    7. repec:ocp:ppaper:pb-16/10 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Schmitz, Andrew, 1995. "Political Economic Analysis in Agricultural Trade and Competitiveness," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183393, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Yves Jégourel, 2016. "Potash: a typical price war," Policy briefs on Trade Dynamics and Policies 1602, Policy Center for the New South.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:73:y:1991:i:2:p:255-265.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.