IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v71y1989i4p970-979..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asset Fixity and Investment Asymmetry in Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Carl H. Nelson
  • John B. Braden
  • Jae-Sun Roh

Abstract

Fixed asset theory implies that it is more difficult to dispose of capital specific to agricultural production than to add to the stock of specialized capital. This theory is tested by determining whether transitions between states of disinvestment are as likely as transitions between states of investment. Of the twenty-four annual capital stock series analyzed, evidence of asymmetry between investment and disinvestment is strong in eight cases, weak in four, and insignificant in twelve. There is considerable, although mixed, evidence of asymmetry for tractors (farm and nonfarm) and other specialized vehicles since World War II and for agricultural machinery.

Suggested Citation

  • Carl H. Nelson & John B. Braden & Jae-Sun Roh, 1989. "Asset Fixity and Investment Asymmetry in Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 970-979.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:71:y:1989:i:4:p:970-979.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1242673
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bermúdez-Barrezueta, Natalia & Camino-Mogro, Segundo & Arboleda, Xavier, 2022. "Production and enterprise profitability in Ecuador’s crop-growing sector," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    2. Brenda L. Boetel & Ruben Hoffmann & Donald J. Liu, 2007. "Estimating Investment Rigidity within a Threshold Regression Framework: The Case of U.S. Hog Production Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(1), pages 36-51.
    3. Lin, Ni & Shumway, C. Richard, 2000. "Asset Fixity In U.S. Agriculture: Robustness To Functional Form," Ag Econ Series 12967, Washington State University, School of Economic Sciences.
    4. Jana LOSOSOVÁ & Radek ZDENĚK & Jaroslav SVOBODA, 2020. "Tangible fixed assets in Czech small and middle-sized farms Abstract: The aim of this paper is to analyse the development, structure and efficiency of tangible fixed assets in the Czech farms and iden," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 236-251, June.
    5. Richards, Timothy J., 1996. "Economic Hysteresis And The Effects Of Output Regulation," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:71:y:1989:i:4:p:970-979.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.