IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v70y1988i1p37-49..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Strategies for Control of Irrigation-Induced Salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Richard L. Gardner
  • Robert A. Young

Abstract

Dissolved mineral salts (salinity) adversely affects numerous urban and agricultural users of Colorado River water in southwestern United States and in Mexico. More than a third of the salt load is thought to be induced by drainage from irrigated lands onto highly saline groundwater deposits in the Upper Colorado Basin in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Various public policy initiatives are proposed to induce farmers to reduce discharges of this nonpoint pollutant. Taxes on water, water conservation subsidies, and land and water rights purchases are analyzed in a linear programming framework. The allocative efficiency and the distribution of control costs and damages among irrigators, water users, and taxpayers are assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard L. Gardner & Robert A. Young, 1988. "Assessing Strategies for Control of Irrigation-Induced Salinity in the Upper Colorado River Basin," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(1), pages 37-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:70:y:1988:i:1:p:37-49.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241974
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Athukorala, Wasantha & Wilson, Clevo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "Social welfare losses from groundwater over-extraction for small-scale agriculture in Sri Lanka: Environmental concern for land use," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 47-55.
    2. Thomas Spencer & Tihomir Ancev & Jeff Connor, 2009. "Improving Cost Effectiveness of Irrigation Zoning for Salinity Mitigation by Introducing Offsets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(10), pages 2085-2100, August.
    3. Jonish JE., 1992. "River as an international environmental resource: the case of the Colorado," ILO Working Papers 992863063402676, International Labour Organization.
    4. Wichelns, Dennis & Oster, J.D., 2006. "Sustainable irrigation is necessary and achievable, but direct costs and environmental impacts can be substantial," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 114-127, November.
    5. Hoag, Dana L. & Conradie, Beatrice, 2003. "The Cost Of Meeting Equity: Opportunity Cost Of Irrigation In The Fish-Sundays Scheme Of South Africa," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25832, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. repec:ilo:ilowps:286306 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2002. "Agriculture and the environment," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 1249-1313, Elsevier.
    8. Semaan, Josephine & Flichman, Guillermo & Scardigno, Alessandra & Steduto, Pasquale, 2007. "Analysis of nitrate pollution control policies in the irrigated agriculture of Apulia Region (Southern Italy): A bio-economic modelling approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 357-367, May.
    9. Krissoff, Barry & Ballenger, Nicole & Dunmore, John C. & Gray, Denice, 1996. "Exploring Linkages Among Agriculture, Trade, and the Environment: Issues for the Next Century," Agricultural Economic Reports 33961, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Bethune, M. & Wang, Q.J. & Gyles, O., 2008. "Minimisation or remediation: A cost benefit comparison of two approaches for managing irrigation-induced deep percolation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 163-170, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:70:y:1988:i:1:p:37-49.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.