IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v70y1988i1p133-141..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Run Comparative Statics Under Output and Land Price Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Quirino Paris

Abstract

Several authors have noticed that, in the uncertain short run, the supply function may slope downward and the input demand functions may slope upward. These possibilities prevent the setup of unambiguous tests of rational behavior. In this article, testable hypotheses for the competitive firm operating in a price-uncertain environment are derived assuming a long-run horizon. Some of these hypotheses take the form of Slutsky-type relations involving the relative input demand functions (the ratios of input to output quantities). Homogeneity restrictions involving input and output mean prices, in general, are absent under uncertainty. Conditions for restoring this homogeneity are also discussed. The main result is the rediscovery of the importance of relative quantities for the analysis of a long-run equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Quirino Paris, 1988. "Long-Run Comparative Statics Under Output and Land Price Uncertainty," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(1), pages 133-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:70:y:1988:i:1:p:133-141.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241983
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atanu Saha & C. Richard Shumway, 1998. "Refutable implications of the firm model under risk," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 441-448.
    2. Bahram Adrangi & Kambiz Raffiee, 1999. "On Total Price Uncertainty and the Behavior of a Competitive Firm," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 43(2), pages 59-65, October.
    3. Liu, Yucan & Shumway, C. Richard, 2005. "Empirical Tests of the Refutable Implications of Expected Utility Maximization under Risk," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19331, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Liu, Yucan & Shumway, C. Richard, 2005. "Indirect Utility Maximization under Risk: A Heterogeneous Panel Application," 2005 Annual Meeting, July 6-8, 2005, San Francisco, California 36307, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Finkelshtain, Israel & Chalfant, James, 1990. "Marketed Surplus Under Risk: Do Peasants Agree with Sandmo?," CUDARE Working Papers 198573, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Luh, Yir-Hueih & Stefanou, Spiro E., 1989. "Dairy Supply And Factor Demand Response To Output Price Risk: An Econometric Assessment," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-6, October.
    7. Detre, Joshua D. & Foster, Kenneth A., 2004. "Indirect Utility Functions And Testable Conditions," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20087, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:70:y:1988:i:1:p:133-141.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.