IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v62y1980i4p629-638..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wheat Cartelization and Domestic Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Robert G. Chambers
  • Michael W. Woolverton

Abstract

The effects of cartelization in the international wheat market are analyzed. Particular attention is given to the relationship between the level of cartel profits and the price farmers receive for their wheat. Sufficient conditions are established for a rise in cartel profits to be associated with a rise in the farmgate price of wheat. The potential stability of a cartel formed by the major trading companies also is investigated and a means of preventing cheating is introduced and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert G. Chambers & Michael W. Woolverton, 1980. "Wheat Cartelization and Domestic Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 629-638.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:62:y:1980:i:4:p:629-638.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1239760
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cano Lamy, Victoria, 1989. "Evaluating the Impact of Price Incentives on Adoption of Technology and Production Patterns in the Ontario Wheat Industry," Working Papers 244050, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    2. Chambers, Robert G. & Paarlberg, Philip L., 1989. "Are More Exports Always Better?: Comparing Cash and In-Kind Export Subsidies," Working Papers 197606, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:62:y:1980:i:4:p:629-638.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.