IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v61y1979i3p395-408..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource and Environmental Constraints to Growth

Author

Listed:
  • V. Kerry Smith
  • John V. Krutilla

Abstract

To evaluate conventional methods for modeling the role of natural resources in economic activities, this analysis reviews the specific attributes of past and current neoclassical models that included natural resources, considering both micro analyses of extractive firm behavior and aggregate optimal planning models, and examines conventional assumptions about constraints to economic activities including both the availability of production materials and the absorptive capacity of environmental resources. An optimal allocation of natural resources (all the original endowments of the earth) requires a conjunctive management strategy so that both the rates of extraction and waste generation are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Kerry Smith & John V. Krutilla, 1979. "Resource and Environmental Constraints to Growth," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(3), pages 395-408.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:61:y:1979:i:3:p:395-408.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1239426
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Brookshire & Thomas Crocker, 1981. "The advantages of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 235-252, January.
    2. Horner, Gerald L. & Dudek, Daniel J., 1979. "An Analytical System For The Evaluation Of Land Use And Water Quality Policy Impacts Upon Irrigated Agriculture," Working Papers 225680, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    3. F. Mackellar & Daniel Vining, 1989. "Measuring natural resource scarcity," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 517-530, October.
    4. Lynne, Gary D. & Carriker, Roy R., 1980. "Ecology And Economics: Differences In Philosophy," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278468, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Leonardo J. Maldonado, 2012. "Política ambiental discrecional y bienestar social: un modelo de inconsistencia dinámica," Economic Analysis Working Papers (2002-2010). Atlantic Review of Economics (2011-2016), Colexio de Economistas de A Coruña, Spain and Fundación Una Galicia Moderna, vol. 1, pages 1-1, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:61:y:1979:i:3:p:395-408.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.