IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v53y1971i3p423-430..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tariffs, Nontariff Distortions, and Effective Protection in U. S. Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Larry J. Wipf

Abstract

This paper extends the effective-protection concept to include tariff and nontariff trade distortions and also the entire structure of domestic farm policy measures. Nominal and effective rates of protection are then presented for disaggregated agricultural production and processing industries for the years 1958, 1963, and 1968. The estimates reveal that nontariff measures give rise to extremely high effective protection rates in certain agricultural sectors; in others, tariff and nontariff measures affecting intermediate inputs have important taxation effects. The analysis also indicates that agricultural policy changes have substantially altered the rates of protection accorded certain agricultural sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Larry J. Wipf, 1971. "Tariffs, Nontariff Distortions, and Effective Protection in U. S. Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 53(3), pages 423-430.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:53:y:1971:i:3:p:423-430.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1238219
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pagoulatos, Emilio & Sorensen, Robert, 1979. "Foreign Trade, Protection, And Multinational Activity In U.S. Food Processing Industries," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, July.
    2. Coyle, Barry & Chambers, Robert G. & Schmitz, Andrew, 1986. "Economic Gains from Agricultural Trade: A Review and Bibliography," Miscellaneous Publications 319990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Johnson, D. Gale, 1977. "PART IV. Postwar Policies Relating to Trade in Agricultural Products," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337216, january.
    4. Webb, Alan J., 1984. "Protection In Agricultural Markets," Staff Reports 277605, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:53:y:1971:i:3:p:423-430.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.