IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v48y1966i4_part_ip811-825..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New York Farm Bureau and the Legislative Processes: A Study in Agricultural Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Robert F. Smith

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of the New York Farm Bureau in the state legislative processes during 1961–1965. The method is empirical and analytical, with extensive interviews and legislative and Bureau reports providing the major sources of data. It supports more general analyses of pressure group politics, such as those of V. O. Key and David Truman, by showing how the organizational unity and efficiency of the Bureau, combined with favorable political and institutional factors, give an organized farm group greater political influence than its numbers would seem to warrant. The conclusion is similar to that demonstrated by Hadwiger and Talbot in their recent study of national agricultural politics: that legislators and groups representing farming areas still determine, for the most part, the contents of governmental farm legislation. There is a need for increased study of state politics and the role of pressure groups, and especially for studies of New York. This analysis is one of several efforts made in recent years to meet this need, and it continues in a more microscopic way the pioneering work done by Belle Zeller in the 1930's on New York pressure group politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert F. Smith, 1966. "The New York Farm Bureau and the Legislative Processes: A Study in Agricultural Politics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 48(4_Part_I), pages 811-825.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:48:y:1966:i:4_part_i:p:811-825.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1236615
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:48:y:1966:i:4_part_i:p:811-825.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.