IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v48y1966i2p279-294..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Israeli Moshav in Nigeria: An Estimate of Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Jerome C. Wells

Abstract

This article provides an estimate of prospective social returns to the Israeli form of agricultural-settlement unit introduced into Western Nigeria in 1961. Evaluation is based on FAO data covering 13 farm-settlement units and including 19 crop and livestock-raising activities. Benefit-cost analysis is used to determine whether the project meets the minimum criteria applied to investment components of the 1962–1968 Nigerian Development Plan, and the evaluative framework is designed (a) to isolate cases where the project can be judged without recourse to measurement of external benefits from those cases where such estimation is required, and (b) to permit examination of the effects on estimated returns resulting from different assumptions about product and factor prices. If the FAO projections of product prices and the government wage and borrowing rates are used as a basis for evaluation, the project appears to be a justifiable component of the National Development Plan; this conclusion is severely weakened when the product- and factor-price assumptions are examined. Acceptability of the project is found to be very sensitive to the possibility of capital rationing and to rather tenuous assumptions about the prices of cocoa and poultry products. Finally it is noted that the rapid expansion of the project leaves it open to substantial losses if the technical assumptions about inputs and yields prove incorrect.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerome C. Wells, 1966. "The Israeli Moshav in Nigeria: An Estimate of Returns," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 48(2), pages 279-294.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:48:y:1966:i:2:p:279-294.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1236218
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:48:y:1966:i:2:p:279-294.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.