IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v100y2018i3p955-974..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Diffusion, Outcome Variability, and Social Learning: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Crane-Droesch

Abstract

This article explores the mechanisms through which social learning mediates technology diffusion. We exploit an experiment on the dissemination of biochar, a soil amendment that can improve fertility on weathered and/or degraded soils. We find that social networks transmit information about the average benefits of adoption, but also its risk, and that observed variability inhibits uptake to a greater degree than positive average results engender it. Paradoxically, this relationship is stronger among networks that do not discuss farming, but disappears among farmer networks that do. This is resolved with a simple model of social learning about conditional, rather than unconditional benefit distributions. As farmers observe factors associated with outcomes in their networks, they constrain the distribution of their own potential outcomes. This conditional distribution diverges from the unconditional distribution that the econometrician observes. We conclude that social learning is characterized by implicit model-building by sophisticated decision makers, rather than simple herding towards observed good results.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Crane-Droesch, 2018. "Technology Diffusion, Outcome Variability, and Social Learning: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(3), pages 955-974.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:100:y:2018:i:3:p:955-974.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aax090
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad, Amal, 2022. "Imperfect information and learning: Evidence from cotton cultivation in Pakistan," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 176-204.
    2. Chowdhury, Shyamal & Satish, Varun & Sulaiman, Munshi & Sun, Yi, 2021. "Sooner Rather Than Later: Social Networks and Technology Adoption," IZA Discussion Papers 14307, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Xinqiang Chen & Xiu-e Zhang & Jiangjie Chen, 2024. "TAM-Based Study of Farmers’ Live Streaming E-Commerce Adoption Intentions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:100:y:2018:i:3:p:955-974.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.