Author
Abstract
Significant changes are happening daily at all levels of society. Profit-based operations are faced with challenges posed by new events, but this is even more so in the case of non-profit organizations and institutions. The changes in the academic community as a consequence of the Bologna process having been introduced into teaching and overall functioning of the academia have brought about both positive and negative results. The opposition to the implementation of the new system into higher education has been caught in the gap between the old education system which still operates in practice and the necessity to implement new programmes in higher education teaching. The supporters of the traditional higher education system rightfully object that the process might become watered down, and that the European education system is not sufficiently harmonized. The Bologna process has introduced direct and indirect changes in the structure of the teaching process, as well as in new professions, such as “knowledge managers”, who conduct formal and structural changes of the academic community. “Knowledge time”, “knowledge industry” and the like require also a certain freedom in knowledge management. With the organizational changes the new “knowledge manager” receives additional tasks of being a real “leader” in restructuring the existing traditional organizations. Structural changes imply changes of values, i.e. changes in the way how business and teaching processes are evaluated. The realization of the Bologna process involves: - emphasizing quality at all organizational levels of an academic community - respect for individual creativity (students and teaching staff ) and appreciation of individual contributions - valuing individual efforts in class, home assignments and intellectual work - devising a new assessment system, etc. New programmes in business and teaching processes are more or less successful in following the continuous transformation and autonomy of higher education institutions. However, the assessment of current organizational changes requires permanent adaptation of the current situation to new development trends.
Suggested Citation
Kata Ivic, 2010.
"Knowledge Economy – Change Management In Higher Education,"
Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 6, pages 674-683.
Handle:
RePEc:osi:journl:v:6:y:2010:p:674-683
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:6:y:2010:p:674-683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hrvoje Serdarusic, PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.