Author
Listed:
- Andrzej Korzeniowski
(Poznan School of Logistics)
- Anna Praiss
(Poznan School of Logistics)
- Julita Zmich
(Poznan School of Logistics)
Abstract
Barcodes on packaging or labels are commonly used as part of the identification of goods at every stage of their flow in the logistics system. The efficiency and speed of the entire process related to the logistics of supply and the distribution of raw materials and finished products depends, among other things, on the proper marking of the loading units. This in turn relates to the correct reading by the automatic identification devices of the information, which is carried by the appropriate symbolism. Barcode is a set of quite simple graphic elements in the form of spaces and lines, arranged in an appropriate layout on a plane. However, the simplicity of these symbols is apparent, as they have precise linear dimensions with relatively narrow tolerances, crossing of which may make it difficult or sometimes impossible for readers to read the code. This is mainly due to the accuracy of the print. Unfortunately, despite the increasing technical and technological level, such situations still occur, as the printing techniques used pose certain problems resulting from the very principle of reproduction. The subject of the research were colour originals in the form of barcodes, printed using the ink-jet method and electrophotography on paper products being the outer layer of packaging on which the printing is applied and on papers used for labelling logistic units. The results of the research allowed to determine the differences in the quality of prints in the area of particular reading parameters.
Suggested Citation
Andrzej Korzeniowski & Anna Praiss & Julita Zmich, 2018.
"Comparative Analysis Of The Quality Of Digitally Printed Barcodes,"
Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 709-724.
Handle:
RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:18:y:2018:p:709-724
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:18:y:2018:p:709-724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Davor Dujak,PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.