IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v2y2024i2p263-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence In Business Operations: Exploring Productivity And Acceptance

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana CIOFU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Doctoral School of Business Administration I)

  • Giulia KONDORT

    (: Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Doctoral School of Business Administration I)

  • Stefana POP

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Doctoral School of Business Administration I)

  • Roxana CIOC

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania Doctoral School of Business Administration I)

Abstract

This paper will provide information on the impact of AI in daily life and work-related activities.Today, AI functionalities could nowadays transform businesses, playing a critical role in enhancing and improving decisions. From virtual assistants to automation tools, AI covers a great amount of information, which could impact the core. In this paper, the productivity and sense of failure of AI will be paper. The productivity of AI, such as, varies by tasks and industry. AI could excel in repetitive and high-precision tasks. On the other hand, humans outperform AI in tasks requiring creativity and emotional intelligence. This qualitative study will show the perception of integrating AI into workflows and asking questions about value added. To evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on business operations, an online survey was conducted to examine perceptions of AI's efficiency, adaptability, and fault tolerance.The analysis revealed generational differences in acceptance and trust towards AI. Younger respondents, particularly those under 25, were found to have greater tolerance for AI errors and a greater willingness to integrate AI into workflows. This is likely to reflect their familiarity with technology. In contrast, older respondents exhibited lower levels of trust and acceptance, particularly in contexts requiring precision, such as financial transactions. The results suggest that while AI is perceived as highly effective in repetitive and data-intensive tasks, its limitations in adaptability and emotional intelligence remain a concern. The findings emohasize the need for reskilling initiatives to facilitate workforce transitions and the development of ethical guidelines to address trust and reliability issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana CIOFU & Giulia KONDORT & Stefana POP & Roxana CIOC, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence In Business Operations: Exploring Productivity And Acceptance," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 263-274, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:2:y:2024:i:2:p:263-274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/AUOES.December.2024.23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Artificial Intelligence; Productivity; Failure; Problem-Solving; Consistency; Precision;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:2:y:2024:i:2:p:263-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.