IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2017i1p365-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role Of Taxes And Contributions In The Fund Of The Hungarian Healthcare System

Author

Listed:
  • Herczeg Adrienn

    (University of Debrecen)

  • Darabos Éva

    (University of Debrecen)

Abstract

The essential function of the taxation is to create the revenue required for financing of the social common consumption so, inter alia, it plays role in the sustainability of the healthcare system. Nowadays, sustainability of financing of the health systems is one of the most challenges for each country. At present, the organization and financing of the health care are a matter of national competence in the EU member states; the fund raising assets include the taxes, contributions and the direct payments of beneficiaries. In our article, we will take into account the tax and contribution rules and trends thereof established in the last decade, examining what effects they had on the fund raising structure of the healthcare system. Data in the essay originates from the database, almanacs and reports of OEP and the World Health Organisation (hereinafter WHO) as well as from the budget legislation. Examining the changes in the revenue structure of Health Insurance Fund during in the last two decades, a significant realignment of resources can be observed: the rate of employers’ contributions has decreased and the rate of individual contributions has tripled, so it becomes clear that the system is social security system only namely and partially; it is financed by the taxes too, paid by everyone. Based on the revenue structure of the Health Insurance Fund of 2016, it can be seen that contribution revenues and contributions are 60.38%, while budget contributions are 20,3% of the total revenue. The amount and rate of social contribution tax was paid to the Health Insurance Fund increased to 20.50% in 2017. In 2012 accident tax, public health product tax and the health contribution of tobacco industry businesses were introduced, the aggregate amount of these taxes was 2.9% of the total revenue. We have found out that the necessity of a reform in the fund raising is a real problem for the Hungarian healthcare system of nowadays which may be a tool for creating the sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Herczeg Adrienn & Darabos Éva, 2017. "Role Of Taxes And Contributions In The Fund Of The Hungarian Healthcare System," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 365-372, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:365-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2017/n1/35.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van de Ven, Wynand P.M.M. & Beck, Konstantin & Van de Voorde, Carine & Wasem, Jurgen & Zmora, Irit, 2007. "Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: 6 years later," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 162-179, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank, Janina, 2016. "Comparing nationwide prevalences of hypertension and depression based on claims data and survey data: An example from Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 1061-1069.
    2. Tsiachristas, Apostolos & Hipple-Walters, Bethany & Lemmens, Karin M.M. & Nieboer, Anna P. & Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen P.M.H., 2011. "Towards integrated care for chronic conditions: Dutch policy developments to overcome the (financial) barriers," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 122-132, July.
    3. Danny Wende, 2019. "Spatial risk adjustment between health insurances: using GWR in risk adjustment models to conserve incentives for service optimisation and reduce MAUP," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(7), pages 1079-1091, September.
    4. Radovan Chalupka, 2010. "Improving Risk Adjustment in the Czech Republic," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(3), pages 236-250.
    5. Pilny, Adam & Wübker, Ansgar & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2017. "Introducing risk adjustment and free health plan choice in employer-based health insurance: Evidence from Germany," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 330-351.
    6. S. H. C. M. van Veen & R. C. van Kleef & W. P. M. M. van de Ven & R. C. J. A. van Vliet, 2018. "Exploring the predictive power of interaction terms in a sophisticated risk equalization model using regression trees," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Buchner, Florian & Goepffarth, Dirk & Wasem, Juergen, 2013. "The new risk adjustment formula in Germany: Implementation and first experiences," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 253-262.
    8. Mark Stabile & Sarah Thomson, 2014. "The Changing Role of Government in Financing Health Care: An International Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(2), pages 480-518, June.
    9. Wagstaff, Adam, 2009. "Social health insurance vs. tax-financed health systems - evidence from the OECD," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4821, The World Bank.
    10. Xu, Weiwei & van de Ven, Wynand P.M.M., 2013. "Consumer choice among Mutual Healthcare Purchasers: A feasible option for China?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 277-284.
    11. Francesco Paolucci & Amir Shmueli, 2011. "The Introduction of Ex-ante Risk Equalisation in the Australian Private Health Insurance Market: A First Step," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 18(2), pages 71-92.
    12. Sibley, Lyn M. & Glazier, Richard H., 2012. "Evaluation of the equity of age–sex adjusted primary care capitation payments in Ontario, Canada," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 186-192.
    13. Constantinou, Panayotis & Tuppin, Philippe & Gastaldi-Ménager, Christelle & Pelletier-Fleury, Nathalie, 2022. "Defining a risk-adjustment formula for the introduction of population-based payments for primary care in France," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 915-924.
    14. Shmueli, Amir & Stam, Piet & Wasem, Jürgen & Trottmann, Maria, 2015. "Managed care in four managed competition OECD health systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(7), pages 860-873.
    15. Shmueli, Amir & Nissan-Engelcin, Esti, 2013. "Local availability of physicians' services as a tool for implicit risk selection," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 53-60.
    16. Ayman Fouda & Gianluca Fiorentini & Francesco Paolucci, 2017. "Competitive Health Markets and Risk Equalisation in Australia: Lessons Learnt from Other Countries," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 745-754, December.
    17. repec:sgm:pzwzuw:v:1:i:2:y:2013:p:193-203 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mohnen Sigrid M. & Rotteveel Adriënne H. & Doornbos Gerda & Polder Johan J., 2020. "Healthcare Expenditure Prediction with Neighbourhood Variables – A Random Forest Model," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 111-138, December.
    19. A. A. Withagen-Koster & R. C. Kleef & F. Eijkenaar, 2020. "Incorporating self-reported health measures in risk equalization through constrained regression," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(4), pages 513-528, June.
    20. Schokkaert, Erik & Van de Voorde, Carine, 2009. "Direct versus indirect standardization in risk adjustment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 361-374, March.
    21. Camilo Cid & Randall P. Ellis & Verónica Vargas & Juergen Wasem & Lorena Prieto, 2015. "Global Risk-Adjusted Payment Models," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series wp2015-021, Boston University - Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax; contributions; healthcare system; Health Insurance Fund; revenue structure; social contribution tax;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:365-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.