IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2016i2p305-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Credibility Of Opinions On A Travel Tourism Website

Author

Listed:
  • Ban Olimpia

    (University of Oradea, University of Oradea)

  • Ancusa Versavia

    (Politehnica University of Timisoara,)

Abstract

When analyzing the online comments on some platforms, their perceived importance / accuracy and/or relevance relative to a location is quantified using two variables: the Gratitude – Appreciation Points(in case of amfostacolo.ro) and the score. While the score should be the “real” value, the Gratitude – Appreciation Points represents the social correction of that value. The research base was the travel comments website Am Fost Acolo/ I Was There (amfostacolo.ro), which is a Romanian site where you can gather and where you can post holiday impressions, you can watch pictures, you can see and compare deals and can make bookings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ban Olimpia & Ancusa Versavia, 2016. "Evaluation Credibility Of Opinions On A Travel Tourism Website," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 305-312, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:305-312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2016/n2/030.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    satisfaction; accomodation; modeling online evaluation; credibility; amfostacolo.ro;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z33 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Marketing and Finance
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:305-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.