IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2015i2p651-657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Litigation Damages Including Intangible Assets Value

Author

Listed:
  • Mihai Berinde

    (Doctoral School of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania,)

  • Dana Petrica

    (Doctoral School of Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania,)

Abstract

Intangible assets are very different from tangible assets, in substance but also in their nature. Their valuation is more sensitive than the tangible assets’ valuation. Some of them, the ones acquired, are easier to value because there is always the solution to use their book value. But when we talk about goodwill, the things radically change. Usually, the International Accounting Standards – IAS - do not allow companies to record in their books the value of goodwill. This is only recognized when a company is acquired by another company, and the price paid in this transaction is higher than the acquired company’s assets. In cases of international arbitration things are also different; there are some cases judged at International Centre for Settlement of Investors Disputes in which the arbitrators decided to calculate the damages by taking in account the intangible assets of the damaged part. The methods used in intangibles assets valuation are: income approach, market approach and cost approach. In the income approach we can talk about discounted cash flows generated be the intangible asset being valued or about the royalty relief. In international arbitration damage valuation we can also find a global method. This present paper is a brief description of these methods and of their use in some ICSID cases: Siemens v Argentina, Sedcov v NIOC Iran. Amoco International Finance v Iran. The underlined idea of this paper can be summarized like these: by compensation in international arbitration, the damaged part should arrive in the same financial position as if the breach wouldn’t have place. In order to get to this scope, the damages calculated must take in account the whole value of the business of the damaged party, and this is composed from tangible and intangible assets, even if some of the last ones are not record in the books of the company. There are cases where the value of intangibles’ value is a few times higher than the tangibles’ value. Specially, the goodwill value can be very significant. International Accounting Standards defines goodwill as: “An asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognised.” (International Financial Reporting Standards®, 2014:1389)

Suggested Citation

  • Mihai Berinde & Dana Petrica, 2015. "International Litigation Damages Including Intangible Assets Value," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 651-657, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:651-657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2015/n2/077.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    valuation methods; goodwill; patents; damages; ICSID;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • F37 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Finance Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:651-657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.