Avantages Et Inconvenients D'Un Dispositif Clil / Emile Dans L'Enseignement Des Matieres Economiques Dans Un Contexte Roumain

The preoccupation for an entrepreneurial university today moves the focus to partnerships with foreign universities and / or socio-economic environment. The academic and professional mobility not only requires harmonization of subject content, but also a better mastery of foreign languages; they turn out to be more than just general communication tools, becoming factors of competitive advantage. In this context, teaching by methods type CLIL (Content and language integrated learning) / EMILE (Enseignement d'une matière intégré à une langue étrangère) is a way for a university that can provide a lot of benefits. A research conducted as part of the Toulouse higher education institutions around the functional CLIL in Economics, was the starting point for our research within the Faculty of Economics of the University of Oradea Romania. If the french study examines "the logic [...] of excellence with open borders" (Taillefer, 2004) of this teaching system that already has a tradition in the French university, we will observe several issues of his early life in the Romanian universities. Through the statements of teachers involved since 2015 in the teaching and learning of international business in English, we will see the benefits, obstacles, challenges, and openings in this educational opportunity. We will put particular emphasis on the role of foreign languages in teaching of subjects and their effect on plural repertoires of the learners (Beacco et al., 2012).