Author
Abstract
Competiveness has a variety of definitions that lead to different indicators, each with its own particular application. Moreover, for any single concept of competitiveness, several measures may be constructed, depending on further specific assumptions. No single measure, or limited set of measures can provide all the information required to assess and manage an economy. In this paper we decided to construct two composite indices to assess two dimensions of competitiveness: one called simply economic robustness and the second one called price competitiveness. Almost all the time the decisions we make depend on what me measure, how we do our measurements and how we interpret them. To construct the composite indices we applied an exploratory factor analysis which is based on the idea that strongly correlated indicators refer to the same underlying (latent) dimension. Thus, a data set consisting of many indicators can be reduced into a single or a small number of composite variables (the so-called factor scores), each reflecting a significant part of the total variance. The indicators included in our analysis are: GDP per capita, domestic demand, private consumption, governmental consumption, gross fixed capital formation, harmonized index of consumer prices (HICP), Labor Cost Index (LCI), Industrial Production Index (IPI), export of goods and services, import of goods and services, real effective exchange rate (UCL based) and population and the data were collected for all EU Member States in the year 2010, as they are considered to track wealth and economic growth, indicate economic robustness and correlate with countries competitiveness. After constructing the composite indices, we tested their robustness throughout a pooled OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) regression on the GDP per capita, as the dependent variable. The outcomes proved to be significant and having the expected signs. The conclusions highlight that among countries that were characterized by high economic robustness in 2010 are Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Netherlands and United Kingdom, while among the countries that performed poorly we can mention Malta, Estonia, Bulgaria and Romania.
Suggested Citation
Popa Angela Cristina, 2013.
"Is There Any Reliable Compass For Tracking Eu Member States Competitiveness?,"
Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 309-319, July.
Handle:
RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:309-319
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:309-319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.