IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2012i2p52-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations Upon Romania'S Manufacturing Competitiveness In The European Context

Author

Listed:
  • VASILESCU Felician

    (Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Faculty of International Business, Dept. of International Business)

  • LUTAN Iustina

    (Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Faculty of International Business, Dept. of International Business)

  • RUJAN Ovidiu Adrian

    (Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Faculty of International Business, Dept. of International Business)

Abstract

Manufacturing structure is essential to ensure the dynamic equilibrium of the whole economy. In fact, this industry is the one that disseminates through the organization and conduct of business as well as by the products delivered, elements of technological progress and new, modern work methods, with significant economic effects. Today in the Romanian industry, an urgent matter is material and energy cost savings thus increasing the value added. According to the economic development, within the industrial structural changes, usually occur the following main trends: the declining share of production from mining industry, while increasing the intermediate and final production, the declining share of industries with labor intensive and reduced complexity and diminishing, starting from a certain development level, of the share of industries with intensive natural resources deficits, especially energy resources, increasing the branches characterized by intensive and highly skilled labor, priority development of branches based on inventions vastly incorporating R&D, etc.. Some of those trends are increasingly emphasized by research, technological transfer and international trade, processes that enhance the interdependence between and within national economies. Labor-intensive industries reduce their share in total industry in developed countries. Demand for products manufactured by these industrial branches begins gradually to be met by developing countries. Production based mostly on the traditional technologies, easily transferable, is moving gradually from more developed countries to least developed ones. In contrast, in the industrialized countries are rapidly developing those industries incorporating important R&D results. These processes had been the subject for several specific research. Although labor productivity decisively influence GDP per capita during long periods of time, the correlation between GDP annual growth rate and labor productivity growth rate differs between countries. GDP per capita is strongly and positively correlated in most countries with labor productivity per capita relative to production and income per capita relative to consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • VASILESCU Felician & LUTAN Iustina & RUJAN Ovidiu Adrian, 2012. "Considerations Upon Romania'S Manufacturing Competitiveness In The European Context," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 52-56, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:52-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2012/n2/005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Susan Chun & Trefler, Daniel, 2005. "Trade and inequality in developing countries: a general equilibrium analysis," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 21-48, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julien Gourdon, 2011. "Wage inequality in developing countries: South–South trade matters," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 58(4), pages 359-383, December.
    2. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-114 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Blyde, Juan & Molina, Danielken, 2015. "Logistic infrastructure and the international location of fragmented production," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 319-332.
    4. Arnaud Costinot & Jonathan Vogel, 2010. "Matching and Inequality in the World Economy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 118(4), pages 747-786, August.
    5. Amiti, Mary & Cameron, Lisa, 2012. "Trade Liberalization and the Wage Skill Premium: Evidence from Indonesia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 277-287.
    6. Hisako Kai & Shigeyuki Hamori, 2009. "Globalization, financial depth, and inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(3), pages 2025-2037.
    7. Ann Harrison & John McLaren & Margaret S. McMillan, 2010. "Recent Findings on Trade and Inequality," NBER Working Papers 16425, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Unjung Whang, 2016. "Skilled-Labor Intensity Differences Across Firms, Endogenous Product Quality, and Wage Inequality," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 251-292, April.
    9. Njangang, Henri & Beleck, Alim & Tadadjeu, Sosson & Kamguia, Brice, 2022. "Do ICTs drive wealth inequality? Evidence from a dynamic panel analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    10. Pi, Jiancai & Zhang, Pengqing, 2018. "Skill-biased technological change and wage inequality in developing countries," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 347-362.
    11. Christis G. Tombazos, 2010. "Trade and Wage Inequality in a World of Incomplete Diversification," Chapters, in: Noel Gaston & Ahmed M. Khalid (ed.), Globalization and Economic Integration, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Elhanan Helpman & Oleg Itskhoki & Stephen Redding, 2010. "Inequality and Unemployment in a Global Economy," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1239-1283, July.
    13. Nicola Gagliardi & Benoît Mahy & François Rycx, 2020. "Trade, GVCs, and wage inequality: Theoretical and empirical insights," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 115-134.
    14. Cong S. Pham & Mehmet Ali Ulubaşoğlu, 2016. "The role of endowments, technology and size in international trade: new evidence from product-level data," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 913-937, October.
    15. Raveh, Ohad & Reshef, Ariell, 2016. "Capital imports composition, complementarities, and the skill premium in developing countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 183-206.
    16. Hrushikesh Mallick & Mantu Kumar Mahalik & Hemachandra Padhan, 2020. "Does globalization exacerbate income inequality in two largest emerging economies? The role of FDI and remittances inflows," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 67(4), pages 443-480, December.
    17. Soumendra Nath Banerjee & Boishampayan Chatterjee, 2015. "European Union: Characterising India’s Exports to the U.S.: The Post Liberalisation Dynamics," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 3(1), pages 10-20, May.
    18. Tomasz Serwach, 2022. "The European Union and within-country income inequalities. The case of the New Member States," Working Papers hal-03548416, HAL.
    19. Yoshinori Kurokawa, 2011. "Variety-skill complementarity: a simple resolution of the trade-wage inequality anomaly," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 46(2), pages 297-325, February.
    20. Michael A. Landesmann & Robert Stehrer, 2007. "Income Distribution, Technical Change And The Dynamics Of International Economic Integration," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 45-73, February.
    21. Ann Harrison & John McLaren & Margaret McMillan, 2011. "Recent Perspectives on Trade and Inequality," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 261-289, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labor intensive industries; Energy intensity; Value added in manufacturing; Highly skilled labor; Capital intensive goods;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:52-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.