IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2011i2p618-624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Experiences In Reporting Intellectual Capital In Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Silvestri Antonella

    (University of Calabria, Economics)

  • Veltri Stefania

    (University of Calabria, Economics)

Abstract

The paper focuses on the intellectual capital (IC) report in universities, a relevant theme actually for the growing interest in applying an IC approach in managing universities. The paper compares the experiences in reporting IC of two different university institutions, the Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM) and the Austrian Universities, to highlight pros and cons of the two different IC models employed. In order to compare these two experiences, firstly we analyzed, through a literature review, the state-of-the-art in measuring and reporting IC, then we focus on the IC measurement models used as framework by the two institution, finally we turned our attention to the IC reports issued by the two universities. Both experiences presented refer to advanced IC measurement models, but both suffer of some limits in applying the models in practice. Like all measurement and management systems that deal with knowledge-based processes, Austrian and UAM's IC reports face the methodological problems of measuring non-physical processes and outputs. In detail, Austrian IC reports lack of qualitative indicators, UAM's IC report lacks of efficiency-related and activities-related indicators.The main research limit is that the theoretical comparison has been carried out on two experiences, due to the lack of awareness of IC relevance in managing universities. The establishment of an ad hoc IC measurement model for universities could have both internal and external benefits. As regards the policy implications, Government, ranking universities by their IC, can get information about their strengths and weaknesses and using it to reallocate resources. This study contributes to broaden the research community's understanding about a relevant management (internal) and communication (external) universities' tool, the IC report, through the examination of two real life European universities experiences in disclosing intangibles. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that focuses on comparing the two best university practices in reporting IC.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvestri Antonella & Veltri Stefania, 2011. "Comparing Experiences In Reporting Intellectual Capital In Universities," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 618-624, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:618-624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2011/n2/087.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karl-Heinz Leitner, 2004. "Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 129-140, August.
    2. Nory Jones & Curtis Meadow & Miguel-Angel Sicilia, 2009. "Measuring Intellectual Capital in Higher Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(02), pages 113-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yolanda Ramírez & à ngel Tejada & Silvia Gordillo, 2013. "Recognition of intellectual capital importance in the university sector," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 3(4), pages 27-41, April.
    2. Giovana Escrivão & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2016. "Linking Knowledge Creation and Environmental Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Chatterji, Niti & Kiran, Ravi, 2017. "Role of human and relational capital of universities as underpinnings of a knowledge economy: A structural modelling perspective from north Indian universities," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 52-61.
    4. Alessandra Allini & Rosanna Span? & Annamaria Zampella & Fiorenza Meucci, 2020. "Integrated Performance Plans in Higher Education as means of accounting change. Insights into the Italian context," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(1), pages 87-110.
    5. Yassaman Khalili & Hossein Fakhari & Esfandiar Malekian & Hassanali Aghajani, 2017. "The Identification of Effective Factors on Intellectual Capital Reporting of the Universities of Iran," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 345-350.
    6. Muhammad Niqab & Janet Hanson & Arthur Bangert & Sathiamoorthy Kannan & Sailesh Sharma & Abdul Ghaffar & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik, 2020. "Measuring Intellectual Capital in Schools in the Developing Country of Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, March.
    7. Wasim ul Rehman & Faryal Jalil & Omur Saltik & Suleyman Degirmen & Mustafa Bekmezci, 2024. "Leveraging Strategic Innovation and Process Capabilities for Intellectual Capital Initiative Performance of Higher Education Institutes (HEIs): A Knowledge-Based Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4161-4202, March.
    8. Kateřina Kuralová & Klára Margarisová, 2016. "Intellectual Capital Disclosure at Czech Public Universities in Relation to the Stakeholder Information Need," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(6), pages 1989-1998.
    9. Constantin BRATIANU & Florina PINZARU, 2015. "Challenges for the University Intellectual Capital in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 3(4), pages 609-627, December.
    10. Jianu (Dumitru), Ionela & Dumitru, Ionut, 2011. "University rankings – a guide to choose a university?," MPRA Paper 29623, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Marta-Christina Suciu & Irina-Virginia Drăgulănescu & Alexandru Ghiţiu-Brătescu & Luciana Picioruş & Cosmin Imbrişcă, 2011. "Universities` Role in Knowledge-Based Economy and Society. Implications for Romanian Economics Higher Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 420-436, June.
    12. Fernando Martin-Alcazar & Marta Ruiz-Martinez & Gonzalo Sanchez-Gardey, 2019. "Social Capital and Academic Research Performance: A Conceptual Model Proposal," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(2), pages 22-31, March.
    13. Yolanda Ramírez Córcoles & Ángel Tejada Ponce & Jean Vanderdonckt, 2013. "How to Respond to Information Needs of University Stakeholders: Proposal of Indicators for Reporting on Intellectual Capital," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 3(3), pages 1-2, June.
    14. Orfa Posada-Arias & Jesenia Avendaño-Ramírez & Jose Arias-Pérez, 2018. "Intellectual Capital Management and University Research Group Performance: Mediating Effects of Machiavellianism and Organisational Narcissism," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Andrei-Razvan CRISAN, 2016. "An Assessment Of The Transparency Level In Romanian Public Universities," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 83-91, December.
    16. Ramírez Córcoles, Yolanda & Santos Peñalver, Jesús F. & Tejada Ponce, Ángel, 2011. "Beneficios y costes de la divulgación de información sobre capital intelectual: evidencia empírica en las universidades públicas españolas/Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Capital Disclosure: Empiri," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 29, pages 905(28á.)-9, Diciembre.
    17. repec:hal:journl:hal-04678949 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Ramírez Córcoles, Yolanda & Santos Peñalver, Jesús F., 2013. "Propuesta de un Informe de Capital Intelectual para las instituciones de educación superior españolas/Proposal of Intellectual Capital Report to Spanish Higher Education Institutions," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 31, pages 525-554, Septiembr.
    19. Rocco Frondizi & Chiara Fantauzzi & Nathalie Colasanti & Gloria Fiorani, 2019. "The Evaluation of Universities’ Third Mission and Intellectual Capital: Theoretical Analysis and Application to Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    20. Ramírez Córcoles, Yolanda & Tejada Ponce, Ángel, 2013. "Cost–benefit analysis of intellectual capital disclosure: University stakeholders’ view," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 106-117.
    21. Luis Antonio Orozco Castro, 2015. "Diversidad y heterogeneidad en redes de colaboración científica. Un estudio de las escuelas de administración de América Latina," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Administración de Empresas, edition 1, number 44, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intellectual capital; universities;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:618-624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.