IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/ajoeal/v9y2024i2p177-190id1172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers’ cognition in changing practice: Implementing group discussion in EFL classes in universities in South-Western China

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Murray
  • Anthony John Liddicoat
  • Fengchao Zhen

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative study that examined how group discussions were used in EFL classes at universities in Yunnan Province, a resource-limited region in southwest China and how regional issues affected their use and effectiveness. It focuses, in particular, on the role of pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical reasoning in implementing group discussion in tertiary-level English classes. The data was collected through a combination of classroom observations and interviews with a group of teachers who had recently completed an extensive professional development program and were seeking to bring about change in their practice after attending the workshop. The findings indicate that although most teachers understood the importance of group discussion to students’ learning and to respond to the new English language curriculum’s emphasis on developing their communicative competence, they did not necessarily have the pedagogical knowledge and reasoning needed to implement group discussion tasks effectively or to respond to the challenges attempts to do so presented within their institutional cultures. These findings emphasize the need for in-service and pre-service language teacher development programmes that enhance teachers’ knowledge of theory, their appreciation of its practical relevance, and their ability to apply that knowledge in their pedagogical decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Murray & Anthony John Liddicoat & Fengchao Zhen, 2024. "Teachers’ cognition in changing practice: Implementing group discussion in EFL classes in universities in South-Western China," American Journal of Education and Learning, Online Science Publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 177-190.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:ajoeal:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:177-190:id:1172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajel/article/view/1172/1618
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:ajoeal:v:9:y:2024:i:2:p:177-190:id:1172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajel/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.