IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbfi/y2021iq3-21b4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European banks in Russia: developments and perspectives from 2017 through the COVID-19 pandemic (2020/2021)

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Russia’s recent economic growth has been supported by the country’s banking sector, including the European banks operating in the market. While Russia’s pre-pandemic GDP growth had suffered from a weak investment climate, oil price volatility and sanctions, the strong financial buffers built up in recent years were an asset for the country and its banking system during the pandemic-triggered recession. The European banks that qualify as significant institutions (Raiffeisenbank Russia, Rosbank/Société Générale and UniCredit Bank Russia), while pursuing different strategies, have remained committed to the Russian market. During the crisis, banking and economic activity were supported by temporary regulatory forbearance with respect to asset (loan) valuation and provisioning as well as the central bank’s key rate cuts and targeted government subsidies. European banks in Russia nevertheless keep facing exogenous risks, such as sustained compliance with sanctions regimes in a situation that remains volatile and sensitive to adverse geopolitical developments. Foreign currency fluctuations and the depreciation of the ruble require adequate risk management, and climate risk represents an emerging challenge. There is also strong competition driven by the digital transformation of banking. In March and April 2021, Russia’s central bank raised its key policy rate again amid rising inflationary pressures and signs of incipient economic recovery. Once regulatory lenience and lending subsidies expire, the banking sector would in general appear sufficiently capitalized to cover a potential increase of loan losses and provisioning needs. This goes especially for the European banks in Russia, which tend to have better-than-average asset quality and a sound capital base, although their market environment is expected to remain challenging. Besides, generous reserves remain at the disposal of the authorities should financial problems emerge, a scenario whose implications remain untested in the case of European banks due to their resilient performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Barisitz & Philippe Deswel, 2021. "European banks in Russia: developments and perspectives from 2017 through the COVID-19 pandemic (2020/2021)," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/21, pages 59-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfi:y:2021:i:q3/21:b:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:85bcac54-66d2-4695-91be-22ffca269d4e/04_feei_Q3_21_European-banks-in-Russia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephan Barisitz, 2019. "Nonperforming loans in CESEE – a brief update on their definitions and recent developments," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q2/19, pages 61-74.
    2. Stephan Barisitz, 2018. "The Russian banking sector: between instability and recovery," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 35, pages 59-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephan Barisitz & Philippe Deswel, 2023. "Russia’s banking sector and its EU-owned significant banks, against the backdrop of war and sanctions," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q1/23, pages 23-41.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    banking sector; financial stability; COVID-19; crisis; credit risk; European banks; FDI; nonperforming loans; profitability; recovery; regulatory forbearance; restructuring; Russia; sanctions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • P34 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfi:y:2021:i:q3/21:b:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elisabeth Beckmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.