IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/neakaa/5ksdxhgkpzlw.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National Legislative and Regulatory Activities

Author

Listed:
  • OECD
  • NEA

Abstract

One amendment changes the funding of the activities of the Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC) whereby part of the fees is transformed into taxes. Besides taxes, fees and administrative fines, funding is possible by means of donations, legacies and extra fees.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd & Nea, 2009. "National Legislative and Regulatory Activities," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2009(1), pages 99-115.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:neakaa:5ksdxhgkpzlw
    DOI: 10.1787/nuclear_law-v2009-art6-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/nuclear_law-v2009-art6-en
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/nuclear_law-v2009-art6-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giuseppe Campa & Valeria De Bonis, 2014. "Two Crucial Features in Cosciani?s Thought," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 113-121.
    2. Robert Breunig & Vishesh Agarwal & Sadia Arfin & Samuel Weldeegzie & Tong Zhang, 2021. "Nationalism and economic openness: The cross‐country evidence," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), pages 420-434, September.
    3. McFadden, Jonathan R. & Huffman, Wallace E., 2017. "Consumer valuation of information about food safety achieved using biotechnology: Evidence from new potato products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 82-96.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:neakaa:5ksdxhgkpzlw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.