IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/neakaa/5k40cr11h5mt.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adequate protection after the Fukushima Daiichi accident: A constant in a world of change

Author

Listed:
  • William C. Ostendorff
  • Kimberly A. Sexton

Abstract

The tragic accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (NPP) will long be seen as a seminal event in the history of commercial nuclear power. Within the United States, not since the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979 has the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) been confronted with as many important issues, so central to the core of its mission, as have arisen following the Fukushima Daiichi accident. While much of the agency’s attention has rightfully been on the technical merits of the NRC’s Near-Term Task Force (NTTF)1 Report recommendations, the long-term regulatory implications of our post-Fukushima Daiichi actions have not always received similar scrutiny. Now that sufficient time has passed, I believe it is appropriate to take a step back and at a high level see what impact implementation of all these actions will have on our regulatory framework and our approach to adequate protection. Top

Suggested Citation

  • William C. Ostendorff & Kimberly A. Sexton, 2013. "Adequate protection after the Fukushima Daiichi accident: A constant in a world of change," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2013(1), pages 23-41.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:neakaa:5k40cr11h5mt
    DOI: 10.1787/nuclear_law-2013-5k40cr11h5mt
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/nuclear_law-2013-5k40cr11h5mt
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/nuclear_law-2013-5k40cr11h5mt?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:neakaa:5k40cr11h5mt. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.