IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/govkaa/5jrtl4wnp3mn.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

It's spending that matters: From robust control theory to practical heuristics

Author

Listed:
  • Fred Thompson

Abstract

The problems caused by state and local revenue volatility are inherently challenging. Oregon has an especially volatile revenue structure, which can cause all sorts of problems as the state moves through the business cycle. Nevertheless, we have concluded that these problems are caused less by revenue volatility per se than by adjusting spending up and down to match current revenue flows, from growing spending at unsustainable rates during booms and cutting back precipitously during busts. The mild recession of 2001-02 had a particularly severe aftermath in Oregon. This event shocked the state’s policy makers into addressing the revenue volatility issue, making sense of it, and taking steps that greatly mitigated the adverse effects of the “Great Recession”. This article describes three things: the public-policy processes that produced this moderately happy outcome, my own voyage of discovery as I observed/participated in these processes, and a set of practical mechanisms states can use to stabilise spending. JEL classification: H11, H20, H70 Keywords: Oregon, Great Recession, cash flows, income taxes, revenue volatility

Suggested Citation

  • Fred Thompson, 2015. "It's spending that matters: From robust control theory to practical heuristics," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5jrtl4wnp3mn
    DOI: 10.1787/budget-14-5jrtl4wnp3mn
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-14-5jrtl4wnp3mn
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/budget-14-5jrtl4wnp3mn?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fred Thompson & Kawika Pierson & Michael L. Hand & Michael U. Dothan, 2017. "Is a Good Normative Model of Public Spending Run Backward a Good Positive Model?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 35-57, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    oregon; great recession; cash flows; income taxes; revenue volatility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5jrtl4wnp3mn. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.