IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oap/ijaefa/v20y2024i2p188-200id1956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The political connection, stakeholders pressure, sustainability reports disclosure, and business risk as moderating variable

Author

Listed:
  • Mukhtaruddin
  • Hendra Susanto
  • Umi Kalsum

Abstract

The objectives of this research investigated the effect of political connection, stakeholder pressure (environmental pressure, customer’s pressure, employee’s pressure, and foreign pressure) on the sustainability report disclosure and business as a moderating variable. Manufacturing sector companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange for the 2019–2023 periods have a target population. Samples were selected by some criteria, and the 15 manufacturing companies were determined as a sample. The annual report and sustainability report are the sources of the data. To test hypotheses, we are using multiple regression and moderate multiple regression analysis. The employee pressure and environmental pressures do not significantly affect the sustainability report disclosure, while political connections, consumer pressure, and foreign pressure have a significant effect on the sustainability report disclosure. Business risk can moderate the relationship between consumer pressure and sustainability report disclosure, while it cannot moderate the relationship between political connection, environmental pressure, employee’s pressure, and foreign pressure and sustainability reports. The findings of this research have some implications for companies and governments. The company should pay attention to political connections and customer pressure because it can effect a decision related to disclosure of the sustainability reports, and (b) government determines the sustainability report standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukhtaruddin & Hendra Susanto & Umi Kalsum, 2024. "The political connection, stakeholders pressure, sustainability reports disclosure, and business risk as moderating variable," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 20(2), pages 188-200.
  • Handle: RePEc:oap:ijaefa:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:188-200:id:1956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/article/view/1956/1092
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oap:ijaefa:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:188-200:id:1956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Heather Rothman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.