IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oap/ijaefa/v20y2024i1p101-113id1928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breaking down the impenetrable wall: What are the barriers to good corporate governance practices above all?

Author

Listed:
  • Abd Hadi Mustaffa
  • Roshidah Safeei
  • Norfarah Syahirah Mohd Fadzilah
  • Nor Adilla Tajarahim

Abstract

Good corporate governance practices are essential in every organisation to ensure accountability and due diligence enhancing corporate value. However, some countries face barriers to good corporate governance practices such as poor regulatory frameworks, perceived constraints, and threats from external factors, etc. Therefore, the organisations will face consequences such as eroding shareholder confidence, declining market value and the organisation integrity. Hence, the study’s main objective is to systematically review the barriers to good corporate governance practice in the global context. This study uses a systematic literature review whereby the authors analyse 24 selected articles. Therefore, the main findings indicated ten barriers to good corporate governance practices. The ten barriers are weak regulatory framework, perceived constraints, poor quality of information, external business factors, lack of awareness, confusion of authority, lack of monitoring, board diversity, transparency and investor protection. These findings provide significant contributions in theoretical development for potential scholars and practical implications for organisations, stakeholders, investors, and corporate leaders who aim to strengthen the governance framework, improve organisational resilience and promote sustainable value creation to understand these barriers comprehensively.

Suggested Citation

  • Abd Hadi Mustaffa & Roshidah Safeei & Norfarah Syahirah Mohd Fadzilah & Nor Adilla Tajarahim, 2024. "Breaking down the impenetrable wall: What are the barriers to good corporate governance practices above all?," International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, Online Academic Press, vol. 20(1), pages 101-113.
  • Handle: RePEc:oap:ijaefa:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:101-113:id:1928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/article/view/1928/1084
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oap:ijaefa:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:101-113:id:1928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Heather Rothman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlineacademicpress.com/index.php/IJAEFA/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.