IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/natrud/y2018i2p127-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Debate after the White Book about the Future of EU Expectations and Results

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Moraliyska

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze the White Paper on the future of the EU and to answer whether it has managed to trigger the desired debate. The tasks are: analysis of the scenarios in terms of the degree of integration and the consequences thereof; exploring the views of different stakeholders; analysis of different member states’ positions on the Paper. The methodology includes analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, etc. The limitations are related to the rapidly changing information and its inability to be traced in the Member States.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Moraliyska, 2018. "The Debate after the White Book about the Future of EU Expectations and Results," Nauchni trudove, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 127-142, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2018:i:2:p:127-142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://unwe-research-papers.org/bg/journalissues/article/9967
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Union; White Paper; integration;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • F6 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2018:i:2:p:127-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.