IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/natrud/y2017i2p129-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dirigiste Economy and Economic Planning – Theoretical Analyses and Debates Among the Bulgarian Economists During the 1930s

Author

Listed:
  • Pencho Penchev

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

During the 1930s and early 1940s the problems of the economic dirigiste and its theoretical analysis attracted the attention of the Bulgarian economists. To some extent it was a compensation for the fact that they missed the socialist calculation debate of the interwar period. Their analyses were based mainly on the framework of the neoclassical meta-theory in combination with various other theoretical approaches. They managed to identify a number of problems associated with long-term functioning of the regulated (corporatist) economy – the impossibility to master and control the spontaneous market forces by means of the governmental regulation, inherent administrative constraints for the government and public officials to introduce and control the strict and conscientious implementation of all the laws and normative acts of the system of economic dirigisme etc. A new theory of international trade was developed, whose author was seeking to break away from the rejected labor theory of value. The main content of his concept lies in the claim that protectionism in certain cases may have positive consequences. The Bulgarian economists convincingly proved the incompatibility of capitalism with planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Pencho Penchev, 2017. "Dirigiste Economy and Economic Planning – Theoretical Analyses and Debates Among the Bulgarian Economists During the 1930s," Nauchni trudove, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 129-167, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2017:i:2:p:129-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://unwe-research-papers.org/bg/journalissues/article/9911
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pencho Penchev, 2018. "Constructing a Market Alternative for the Bulgarian Economy during the Interwar Period," Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research, Centre for Economic History Research, vol. 3, pages 33-48, November.
    2. Marco Dimitrov, 2017. "The Role of State-Owned Banks in the Economic Life of Bulgaria in the Period between the Two World Wars (The model of the Bulgarian economy in the 30s of the twentieth century)," Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research, Centre for Economic History Research, vol. 2, pages 192-213, November.
    3. Tsvetelina Marinova & Nikolay Nenovsky, 2019. "Cooperative Agricultural Farms in Bulgaria during Communism (1944-1989): an Institutional Reconstruction," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 22(74), pages 40-73, December.
    4. Nikolay Atanasov, 2021. "Strategy for Development of the Land Properties of the Rila Monastery in the First Quarter of the 20th Century," Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research, Centre for Economic History Research, vol. 6, pages 168-184, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regulated economy; theory; Bulgaria; planning;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B24 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Socialist; Marxist; Scraffian
    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B27 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - International Trade and Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:natrud:y:2017:i:2:p:129-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.