IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2024i2p429-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Consequences of the Right to be Forgotten

Author

Listed:
  • Krasimir Marinov

    (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Jorida Xhafaj

    (Law Faculty, University for Business and Technology, Kosovo)

  • Almarin Frakulli

    (Faculty of Economy, Metropolitan University of Tirana, Albania)

Abstract

The right to privacy and control over one’s own information entails the legal right to request the removal of search results relating to one’s personality if all of those results do not serve the originality of the information or the processing purposes. This paper’s objective is to examine the case for a right to be forgotten from an economic standpoint and the implications of satisfying millions of requests, as well as how the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has changed the way that this right is justified in society. This paper examines the economic consequences of reformulating requirements for realization and the right to remove previously classified material. The consequences are directly related to: the losses caused by a reduction in the amount of data accessible via search engines and the expected reduction in the operators’ commercial interest; the way the right to be forgotten is reflected in the costs associated with processing requests; and the negative effects of violations and sanctions. The conclusions will also evaluate the effects of each search engine’s obligations under the new territorial extension, as well as whether the benefits of upholding this human right outweigh all costs and efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Krasimir Marinov & Jorida Xhafaj & Almarin Frakulli, 2024. "Economic Consequences of the Right to be Forgotten," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 429-438, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2024:i:2:p:429-438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/eajournal/2024.2/EA.2024.2.11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic costs; implications; justification; right to be forgotten.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K36 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Family and Personal Law
    • K39 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2024:i:2:p:429-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.