IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntu/ntugeo/vol4-iss1-16-031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China’s Transition to the Innovation-Driven Economy: Stepping Stones and Road-Blocks

Author

Listed:
  • SARMIZA PENCEA

    (Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, ROMANIA)

  • ANA-CRISTINA BÂLGĂR

    (Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Besides its past outstanding accomplishments in terms of extensive development, China has also accumulated multiple distortions and structural imbalances and has reached a crossroads, where a major qualitative switch is a must. Its outdated export-oriented economic model has covered both the factor-driven and investment-driven stages of development and now China needs to more firmly advance towards the stage of innovation-led growth, transiting from cheaply processing and assembling foreign-designed goods, using foreign-designed technologies and supplying foreign markets, to producing high quality, services-and-knowledge-intensive products, using locally-devised technologies and meeting, primarily, its own domestic demand. This paper looks at the progress attained in recent years in the Chinese research, development and innovation system, sketching its landscape in terms of structure, endowment and goals, inputs and output improvement, significant shifts and trends paving the way to an innovation-driven economy, as well as to potential road-blocks on the way.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarmiza Pencea & Ana-Cristina Bâlgăr, 2016. "China’s Transition to the Innovation-Driven Economy: Stepping Stones and Road-Blocks," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 4(1), pages 31-46, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol4-iss1-16-031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.globeco.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_4_no_1/geo_2016_vol4_no1_art_004.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarmiza Pencea & Cristina Balgar & Daniel Bulin, 2015. "Building blocks of China’s path to technological prowess and innovation-led development," National Strategies Observer (NOS), Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, vol. 2.
    2. Quirin Schiermeier, 2014. "China: At a crossroads," Nature, Nature, vol. 507(7490), pages 129-131, March.
    3. Sarmiza Pencea, 2014. "“The New Season of Chinese Economic Miracle” and its Challenges," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 2(1), pages 56-64, May.
    4. Thomas J. Holmes & Ellen R. McGrattan & Edward C. Prescott, 2015. "The Costs of Quid Pro Quo," Economic Policy Paper 15-1, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lan, Xiujuan & Hu, Zheneng & Wen, Chuanhao, 2023. "Does the opening of high-speed rail enhance urban entrepreneurial activity? Evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Miklós Losoncz, 2017. "The Dilemmas of China’s Shift in Growth Trajectory and Economic Governance," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 16(Sepcial I), pages 21-49.
    3. Ruihan Wang & Zheng Lu & Chunyu Tang, 2024. "How does urbanisation affect agricultural economic resilience? Evidence from China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(10), pages 513-526.
    4. Wensheng Xiao & Haojia Kong & Lifan Shi & Valentina Boamah & Decai Tang, 2022. "The Impact of Innovation-Driven Strategy on High-Quality Economic Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Li, Chenhui & Lian, Xubei & Zhang, Zhi, 2018. "Public education expenditure, institution development, and regional innovations: An empirical evidence from China," Economics Discussion Papers 2018-23, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarmiza Pencea & Cristina Balgar & Daniel Bulin, 2015. "Building blocks of China’s path to technological prowess and innovation-led development," National Strategies Observer (NOS), Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, vol. 2.
    2. Karaulova, Maria & Shackleton, Oliver & Liu, Weishu & Gök, Abdullah & Shapira, Philip, 2017. "Institutional change and innovation system transformation: A tale of two academies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 196-207.
    3. Defever, Fabrice & Riaño, Alejandro, 2017. "Subsidies with export share requirements in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 33-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntu:ntugeo:vol4-iss1-16-031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefan Ciucu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuntro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.