IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v71y2018i4p613-634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Income-Based Effective Tax Rates and Choice-of-Entity Considerations under the 2017 Tax Act

Author

Listed:
  • Bradley T. Borden

Abstract

This article uses a simple simulation to graphically present the effective tax rates at various income levels for small businesses (those with taxable income of $1,000,000 or less) under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) and compares them to effective tax rates at various income levels for small businesses prior to the TCJA. The graphical presentation reveals that the various tax rates under the TCJA complicate choice-of-entity analyses and undermine general rule-of-thumb concepts that drove choice-of-entity decisions prior to the TCJA. Under the TCJA, choice-of-entity preferences will likely be highly situational and may feature combinations of various entities. Using a typical business situation, this article illustrates how different types of entity can cause the effective tax rate on business income at the $1,000,000 level to vary from 21.36 to 34.60 percent. The most favorable effective rate results from an entity structure that combines a C corporation and passthrough entity. Rate variations based upon entity combinations portend subtle, carefully calculated, shifts in choice-of-entity actions following the TCJA.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradley T. Borden, 2018. "Income-Based Effective Tax Rates and Choice-of-Entity Considerations under the 2017 Tax Act," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 71(4), pages 613-634, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:71:y:2018:i:4:p:613-634
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2018.4.02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2018.4.02
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2018.4.02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:71:y:2018:i:4:p:613-634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.