IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v71y2018i2p357-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections of the Holland Medal Recipient: Perils of Tax Reform

Author

Listed:
  • James R. Hines Jr.

Abstract

Tax reforms dangle possibilities of improving the tax system, but are fraught with perils that are evident from the 2017 U.S. experience and caution against frequent reforms of its ilk. The first peril is that reforms containing tax provisions selected simply on the basis of their projected revenue contributions will produce less tax revenue than anticipated, illustrative calculations suggesting shortfalls of roughly 8‐16 percent. The second peril is that reforms will not advance the objectives of efficiency and tax equity to the extent that they include provisions intended to influence future tax legislation or government spending. The third peril is that reforms designed without sufficient appreciation of transitional gains and losses will offer inadequate and misdirected transition relief. And the fourth peril is that reforms stoke expectations of future tax changes, discouraging investment and encouraging costly tax avoidance. Tax reforms that apply sound principles will reduce or even avoid these perils.

Suggested Citation

  • James R. Hines Jr., 2018. "Reflections of the Holland Medal Recipient: Perils of Tax Reform," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 71(2), pages 357-376, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:71:y:2018:i:2:p:357-376
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2018.2.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2018.2.06
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2018.2.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:71:y:2018:i:2:p:357-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.