IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v71y2018i2p295-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Tax Benefits of Hybrid Arrangements — Evidence from the Luxembourg Leaks

Author

Listed:
  • Inga Hardeck
  • Patrick U. Wittenstein

Abstract

Using the Luxembourg Leaks database, we study how multinational firms avoid taxes via hybrid arrangements and assess their corresponding tax benefits. Confidential tax rulings included in this database enable us to deduce and classify the tax arrangements that 123 firms implemented by means of conduit entities in Luxembourg. Based on a difference-in-differences methodology, we show that hybrid arrangements are related to substantial and continuous effective tax rate reductions. These results hold under several robustness checks. Overall, our paper is one of the first to provide empirical support for the considerable benefits of hybrid arrangements outlined in prior theoretical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Inga Hardeck & Patrick U. Wittenstein, 2018. "Assessing the Tax Benefits of Hybrid Arrangements — Evidence from the Luxembourg Leaks," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 71(2), pages 295-334, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:71:y:2018:i:2:p:295-334
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2018.2.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2018.2.04
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2018.2.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johannesen, Niels, 2022. "The global minimum tax," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Nesbitt, Wayne L. & Outslay, Edmund & Persson, Anh V., 2023. "A reexamination of investors' reaction to tax shelter news: Evidence from the Luxembourg tax leaks," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2).
    3. Damgaard, Jannick & Elkjaer, Thomas & Johannesen, Niels, 2024. "What is real and what is not in the global FDI network?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Manon Francois & Vincent Vicard, 2023. "Tax Avoidance and the Complexity of Multinational Enterprises," Working Papers 2023-04, CEPII research center.
    5. Hebous, Shafik & Johannesen, Niels, 2021. "At your service! The role of tax havens in international trade with services," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:71:y:2018:i:2:p:295-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.