IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v68y2015i3p601-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Death and Taxes: An Evaluation of the Impact of Prospective Policies for Taxing Wealth at the Time of Death

Author

Listed:
  • Robert B. Avery
  • Daniel J. Grodzicki
  • Kevin B. Moore

Abstract

We study the efficacy of a capital gains tax relative to the current estate tax. Using wealth data on U.S. households, we forecast changes in household wealth and calculate the importance of untaxed wealth in bequeathed estates. We then compare the aggregate and distributional burden of the current estate tax to policies in which only unrealized capital gains are subject to tax. We estimate that, in the coming decade, unrealized capital gains will comprise nearly half of the gross estate for estates worth over $50 million. Policies taxing capital gains can potentially raise more revenue than the current estate tax, but not without a substantial increase in the fraction of households facing a tax. Due to the high concentration of unrealized gains among the wealthy, we find that, although a modest capital gains allowance substantially reduces tax revenue, it sharply focuses the tax burden on the wealthiest households.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert B. Avery & Daniel J. Grodzicki & Kevin B. Moore, 2015. "Death and Taxes: An Evaluation of the Impact of Prospective Policies for Taxing Wealth at the Time of Death," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 68(3), pages 601-632, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:68:y:2015:i:3:p:601-632
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2015.3.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.3.05
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.3.05
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2015.3.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:68:y:2015:i:3:p:601-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.