IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v56y2003i3p535-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Piling on Problems: How Federal Policies Affect State Fiscal Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Lav, Iris J.

Abstract

This paper pulls from a variety of data sources to estimate the positive and negative impacts of federal policies on state and local finances. For 2004, it finds that a positive federal policy impact of $467 billion is offset by at least $153 billion in negative impacts, representing a one-third reduction in positive impacts. While positive impacts grow only slowly over the next three years, the negative impacts increase rapidly. By 2007, the negative impacts reduce the positive impacts by at least 45 percent. The net value of federal grants and subsidies declines by 18 percent from 2004 to 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Lav, Iris J., 2003. "Piling on Problems: How Federal Policies Affect State Fiscal Conditions," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 56(3), pages 535-554, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:56:y:2003:i:3:p:535-54
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2003.3.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.3.06
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.3.06
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2003.3.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihir A. Desai, 2002. "The Corporate Profit Base, Tax Sheltering Activity, and the Changing Nature of Employee Compensation," NBER Working Papers 8866, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Desai, Mihir A. & Hines, James R. Jr., 2002. "Expectations and Expatriations: Tracing the Causes and Consequences of Corporate Inversions," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 55(3), pages 409-440, September.
    2. Julie H. Collins & Douglas A. Shackelford, 2003. "Do US Multinationals Face Different Tax Burdens than Do Other Companies?," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 17, pages 141-168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. William F. Fox & LeAnn Luna, 2005. "Do Limited Liability Companies Explain Declining State Corporate Tax Revenues?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 33(6), pages 690-720, November.
    4. Inès Bouaziz Daoud & Mohamed Ali Omri, 2011. "Divergences comptabilité - fiscalité, gestion fiscale et gestion des résultats en Tunisie : les nouveaux défis," Post-Print hal-00646800, HAL.
    5. Mills, Lillian F. & Plesko, George A., 2003. "Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 56(4), pages 865-893, December.
    6. April Bang & Brian Chernoff & Charles P. Himmelberg & James M. Mahoney, 2004. "Recent revisions to corporate profits: what we know and when we knew it," Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 10(Mar).
    7. Mr. Thomas Dalsgaard, 2005. "U.S. Tax Reform: An Overview of the Current Debate and Policy Options," IMF Working Papers 2005/138, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Nuno Fernandes & José Guedes, 2010. "Keeping Up with the Joneses: A Model and a Test of Collective Accounting Fraud," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 16(1), pages 72-93, January.
    9. John R. Graham & Mark H. Lang & Douglas A. Shackelford, 2002. "Employee Stock Options, Corporate Taxes and Debt Policy," NBER Working Papers 9289, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Rakia Riguen & Anis Jarboui, 2016. "Divergences comptabilité-fiscalité et Qualité de l'audit externe : Cas de la Tunisie," Post-Print hal-01901210, HAL.
    11. Mihir A. Desai, 2003. "The Divergence between Book Income and Tax Income," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 17, pages 169-208, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Baruch Lev, 2003. "Corporate Earnings: Facts and Fiction," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 27-50, Spring.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:56:y:2003:i:3:p:535-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.