IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v52y1999i3p531-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three Key Design Issues in Analyzing the Trust Fund Investment Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Smetters, Kent

Abstract

This paper provides a unified conceptual framework for understanding the previous literature analyzing the proposal to invest the Social Security Trust Fund in equities. The impact of investing the Social Security Trust Fund in equities on the resources of current and future generations, as well as its impact on unfunded liabilities, depends on three policy design choices: (1) how the increase in expected revenue from Trust Fund investment is allocated relative to a solvent counterfactual baseline; (2) how the risk associated with Trust Fund investment is allocated when realized returns differ from expectation; and (3) the tax base, if any, that risk is allocated to. The choice for each determines whether the expected value and risk is passed to the same generation or whether the expected value is allocated to one generation while the risk is allocated to another. The matching, or lack of matching, of the expected return and risk determines the distributional and economic impact of Trust Fund investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Smetters, Kent, 1999. "Three Key Design Issues in Analyzing the Trust Fund Investment Policy," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 52(3), pages 531-540, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:52:y:1999:i:3:p:531-40
    DOI: 10.1086/NTJ41789739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789739
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789739
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/NTJ41789739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:52:y:1999:i:3:p:531-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.