IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v51y1998i1p143-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Light at the End of the Tunnel or Another Illusion? The 1997 Budget Deal

Author

Listed:
  • Reischauer, Robert D.

Abstract

Projections made after the 1997 reconciliation legislation was enacted suggest that, sometime early in the next century if not before, the nation should enjoy its first surpluses since 1969. The improved fiscal outlook, however, has little to do with the 1997 legislation and more to do with the tax increases and spending reductions enacted in 1990 and 1993, the stronger economy, and a slowdown in government health spending. While the 1997 legislation did not impose much new fiscal restraint, it did make substantial changes in Medicare’s structure and payment levels. It also made the tax code significantly more complex and modestly less equitable without doing much to stimulate long-term economic growth. The surpluses that are projected for a decade beyond 2002 are vulnerable to the possible failure of policymakers to enact the discretionary spending cuts called for in the 1997 legislation, the urge of politicians to preemptively commit the projected surpluses to tax cuts and program expansions, and the possibility of prolonged economic weakness.

Suggested Citation

  • Reischauer, Robert D., 1998. "Light at the End of the Tunnel or Another Illusion? The 1997 Budget Deal," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 51(1), pages 143-168, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:51:y:1998:i:1:p:143-68
    DOI: 10.1086/NTJ41789318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789318
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789318
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/NTJ41789318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:51:y:1998:i:1:p:143-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.