IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlrbe/105.00000076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Gaps in Subjective Wellbeing: A New Paradox to Explore

Author

Listed:
  • Senik, Claudia

Abstract

In high-income countries, women declare a higher level of life satisfaction than men but score lower on measures that capture short-term emotions. The positive gap in life satisfaction is not explained by women’s situation on the labor market, their income, education, personality traits or other personal features or living conditions. We propose two main explanations for this picture. Our first explanation points to the greater diversity of women’s time-use. If there is something like a taste for diversity, then a wider scope of domains of interest is a source of potentially higher wellbeing. However, this larger set of tasks sometimes comes with time-stress, often accompanied with painful multitasking, which would explain women’s lower level of emotional wellbeing. Our second explanation points to the role of expectations as the benchmark that people use to evaluate their living conditions. We show that, especially as concerns labor, women’s expectations are still lower than men’s, although this gap has been decreasing over time and among recent generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Senik, Claudia, 2017. "Gender Gaps in Subjective Wellbeing: A New Paradox to Explore," Review of Behavioral Economics, now publishers, vol. 4(4), pages 349-369, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000076
    DOI: 10.1561/105.00000076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000076
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/105.00000076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Perugini, Cristiano & Vladisavljević, Marko, 2019. "Gender inequality and the gender-job satisfaction paradox in Europe," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 129-147.
    2. Naomi Friedman-Sokuler & Claudia Senik, 2022. "Time-Use and Subjective Well-Being: Is there a Preference for Activity Diversity?," PSE Working Papers halshs-03828272, HAL.
    3. Paul Dolan & Kate Laffan & Alina Velias, 2022. "Who’s miserable now? Identifying clusters of people with the lowest subjective wellbeing in the UK," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 679-710, May.
    4. Fumagalli, Elena & Fumagalli, Laura, 2022. "Subjective well-being and the gender composition of the reference group: Evidence from a survey experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 196-219.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Happiness; Gender gaps; Time-Use; Task Diversity; Expectations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlrbe:105.00000076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.