IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlpip/113.00000078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Friends versus Best Friends: How Different Types of Political Connection Work in China

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Chang

Abstract

This paper differentiates four mechanisms that link firms’ political connections to economic rents and unpacks channels through which firms obtain benefits from political ties. Using Chinese publicly listed firms’ land transaction data as well as a comprehensive dataset of their different types of connections, I differentiate how firms’: (1) reputation, (2) local political influence, (3) access to information, and (4) institutional embeddedness affect land prices and the ways in which firms purchase land. I find that firms with local political influence enjoy a 31% land price discount, the largest compared to other types of connections. More importantly, local connections enable firms to enter into auctions in which they can manipulate land prices before and during the auctions, while firms with good reputations benefit only from restricting potential competitors. My findings demonstrate that different types of political connections differ both in the magnitude of their impacts and the mechanisms by which they work.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Chang, 2023. "Good Friends versus Best Friends: How Different Types of Political Connection Work in China," Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 4(2), pages 259-285, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000078
    DOI: 10.1561/113.00000078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000078
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/113.00000078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.