IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jnlpip/113.00000068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inducing Polarization? The Effect of Congressional Procedure and Partisan Lawmaking on Ideal Point Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Austin Bussing
  • Joshua Y. Lerner

Abstract

How do procedural innovations, such as committee bypass, affect our roll-call-based measurements of individual member ideology — and therefore our measurements of polarization? Congressional polarization, measured using member ideal points derived from scaling roll call data, has been steadily increasing over the last half-century. However, changes in legislative procedure that affect the construction of the roll call record have been concurrent with this apparent increase in polarization. In this paper, we explore the effect of one unorthodox procedure — the use of committee bypass in the House — on the measurement of member ideology and chamber polarization. We utilize matching to generate balanced subsets containing similar bills that bypassed committee to reach the floor and bills that went through “regular order.†With these matched subsets, we estimate the effect of committee bypass on roll call votes and the resulting ideal points and polarization measures. We find that committee bypass has the effect of dampening, rather than exacerbating polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Austin Bussing & Joshua Y. Lerner, 2022. "Inducing Polarization? The Effect of Congressional Procedure and Partisan Lawmaking on Ideal Point Estimation," Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, now publishers, vol. 3(3-4), pages 449-479, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000068
    DOI: 10.1561/113.00000068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/113.00000068
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/113.00000068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jnlpip:113.00000068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.