IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/jlqjps/100.00019045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trumping Hate on Twitter? Online Hate Speech in the 2016 U.S. Election Campaign and its Aftermath

Author

Listed:
  • Siegel, Alexandra A.
  • Nikitin, Evgenii
  • Barberá, Pablo
  • Sterling, Joanna
  • Pullen, Bethany
  • Bonneau, Richard
  • Nagler, Jonathan
  • Tucker, Joshua A.

Abstract

To what extent did online hate speech and white nationalist rhetoric on Twitter increase over the course of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election campaign and its immediate aftermath? The prevailing narrative suggests that Trump's political rise — and his unexpected victory — lent legitimacy to and popularized bigoted rhetoric that was once relegated to the dark corners of the Internet. However, our analysis of over 750 million tweets related to the election, in addition to almost 400 million tweets from a random sample of American Twitter users, provides systematic evidence that hate speech did not increase on Twitter over this period. Using both machine-learning-augmented dictionary-based methods and a novel classification approach leveraging data from Reddit communities associated with the alt-right movement, we observe no persistent increase in hate speech or white nationalist language either over the course of the campaign or in the six months following Trump's election. While key campaign events and policy announcements produced brief spikes in hateful language, these bursts quickly dissipated. Overall we find no empirical support for the proposition that Trump's divisive campaign or election increased hate speech on Twitter.

Suggested Citation

  • Siegel, Alexandra A. & Nikitin, Evgenii & Barberá, Pablo & Sterling, Joanna & Pullen, Bethany & Bonneau, Richard & Nagler, Jonathan & Tucker, Joshua A., 2021. "Trumping Hate on Twitter? Online Hate Speech in the 2016 U.S. Election Campaign and its Aftermath," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 16(1), pages 71-104, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00019045
    DOI: 10.1561/100.00019045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00019045
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/100.00019045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:jlqjps:100.00019045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.