IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/fntisy/2900000004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Dual-process Theory to Information Systems: Current and Future Research Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Watts, Stephanie

Abstract

This monograph presents a research agenda for the application of dualprocess theories to Information Systems (IS) research. It begins by clarifying exactly what a dual-process approach to attitude formation is, explaining how and why it can provide insights that other theoretical approaches cannot. Similarities and differences between the two dominant dual-process theories — the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and the Heuristic Systematic Model (HSM) are discussed. These concepts are illustrated in a review of 26 published dual-process-based IS studies. This body of research is categorized according to a logical schema based on the locus of attitude formation. We then distill from these studies those heuristic cues and moderating factors that are most relevant to understanding IS phenomena. Finally, we identify the following three IS phenomena as offering great potential for further applications of the dual-process approach: First, information filtering under information surplus; second, how credibility assessment interacts with system design features; and third, mediated knowledge work in situ. We hope that by so doing, we can prevent future fragmentation of this widely varied body of research, and avoid premature closure around only a subset of potential areas for dual-process-based IS research.

Suggested Citation

  • Watts, Stephanie, 2015. "Application of Dual-process Theory to Information Systems: Current and Future Research Directions," Foundations and Trends(R) in Information Systems, now publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 69-162, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:fntisy:2900000004
    DOI: 10.1561/2900000004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2900000004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/2900000004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Kloker & Tim Straub & Christof Weinhardt, 2019. "Moderators for Partition Dependence in Prediction Markets," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 723-756, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:fntisy:2900000004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.