IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2018i1p79-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science Education in Russia According to the Results of the TIMSS and PISA International Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Pentin
  • Galina Kovaleva
  • Elena Davidova
  • Elena Smirnova

Abstract

Alexander Pentin - Candidate of Sciences in Physics and Mathematics, Head of the Centre for Science Education. Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education. E-mail: pentin@mail.ru Galina Kovaleva - Candidate of Sciences in Education, Head of the Centre of Evaluating the Quality of Education. Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education. E-mail: galina_kovaleva_rao@mail.ru Elena Davidova - Junior researcher of the Centre of Evaluating the Quality of Education. Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education. E-mail: centeroko@mail.ru Elena Smirnova - Junior researcher of the Centre of Evaluating the Quality of Education. Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education. E-mail: centeroko@mail.ru Address: 5/16 Makarenko Str., 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation. The paper considers features and problems of science education in Russian schools according to how they appeared in the TIMSS and PISA international studies. The main features consist in the decline of student achievement in science when moving from primary school to secondary school and the sharp difference between the results of Russian students demonstrated in TIMSS and PISA. The conclusions are based both on the analysis of the data obtained in the studies (the results of tests, questionnaires of participants, content of tasks) and characteristics of the Federal educational standards and programmes related to science education. The result of the work established the factors influencing the achievements of Russian students in Science at primary, lower and upper secondary school. Namely, the high results by 4th grade pupils in TIMSS is largely due to the high activity of students in acquiring scientific knowledge outside of school. The sharp difference between the results of 8th‑9th grade students in the TIMSS and PISA studies is explained by, on the one hand, the close accordance of the TIMSS framework to the Russian science curricula and, on the other hand, their significant divergence from the PISA framework as the Russian curricula scarcely focused on scientific literacy as a main goal. As one of the factors that explains the decline in the outcomes in physics by 11th-graders in TIMSS Advanced 2015, in comparison with previous cycles, we discuss the increase in the percentage of tasks in the TIMSS test about the physics of the atom and the atomic nucleus, which proved to be more difficult for students. A common feature, which is revealed by studies of TIMSS, PISA and TIMSS-Advanced results from 2015, is that the teaching of science subjects in Russian schools is more focused on acquiring and demonstrating knowledge, but to a lesser extent on their application and the development of scientific practices, such as: formulation of scientific questions, planning research, interpreting data, and constructing scientific evidence. The results of the work propose a modernization of the science education framework in Russian schools, including the introduction of a compulsory subject Science in grades 5-6.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Pentin & Galina Kovaleva & Elena Davidova & Elena Smirnova, 2018. "Science Education in Russia According to the Results of the TIMSS and PISA International Studies," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 79-109.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2018:i:1:p:79-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2018/04/18/1150436248/Pentin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yulia Tyumeneva & Alena Valdman & Martin Carnoy, 2014. "What Does Subject Knowledge Give for Its Applying in New Context. The First Results from Studies TIMSS-2011 and PISA‑2012," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 8-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ларина Г. С. & Капуза А. В., 2020. "Когнитивные Процессы В Преподавании: Связь С Достижениями Учащихся В Математике," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 70-96.
    2. Yulia Koreshnikova & Andrey Zakharov & Fedor Dudyrev, 2018. "Differences in General Education in Vocational and High Schools: Characteristics of Teachers and Teaching Practices in Mathematics," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 228-253.
    3. Galina Larina & Anastasia Kapuza, 2020. "Thinking Skills in Teaching Practices: Relationship with Students' Achievement in Mathematics," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 70-96.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2018:i:1:p:79-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.