Author
Abstract
Irina Abankina, Ph.D. in Economics, Professor, Director of the Education Development Institute, National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. Email: abankinaI@hse.ru Fuad Aleskerov, Eng.D., Professor, Head of Mathematics Department, Faculty of Economics, National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Head of the International Laboratory of Decision Choice and Analysis, National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. Email: alesk@hse.ru Veronika Belousova, Ph.D. in Economics, Head of Department for Methodology of Budget Planning at the Institute of Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. Email: vbelousova@hse.ru Kirill Zinkovsky, Ph.D. in Economics, Deputy Director of the Education Development Institute, National Research University - Higher School of Economics. Email: kzinkovsky@hse.ru Vsevolod Petrushchenko, intern researcher at the International Laboratory of Decision Choice and Analysis, National Research University - Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. Email: goroddt@yandex.ru This paper has systematized DEA-based university efficiency evaluation experience in a number of countries. The authors investigate into DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) models and describe how these models have been implemented by British, German, Greek, Australian and Canadian higher education institutions (HEIs). Comparability of results and consistency of the models have also been studied here.The study has analyzed specific features of applying DEA models to evaluate efficiency of Russian HEIs, depending on the type of university. Performance of Russian HEIs has been compared with regard to their resource potential in educational and scientific activities. It has been discovered that in general, both classical and technical universities in Russia have more potential in educational activities than in science. Meanwhile, technical universities have a higher overall scientific and educational potential (70-90%) than classical universities (50-60%).A comparison of performance of Russian and foreign universities has shown that efficiency level in Russia is higher than in Germany, nearly the same as in Australia and lower than in Canada and in Great Britain.It has been demonstrated through the example of Russian universities that efficiency evaluation should only be performed for universities with similar profiles and basic features. Evaluation of performance of universities allows to reveal their strengths and weaknesses and, knowing this, to build efficient development strategies for each of them.
Suggested Citation
Irina Abankina & Fuad Aleskerov & Veronika Belousova & Kirill Zinkovsky & Seva Petrushchenko, 2013.
"Evaluating Performance of Universities Using Data Envelopment Analysis,"
Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 15-48.
Handle:
RePEc:nos:voprob:2013:i:2:p:15-48
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Tommaso Agasisti & Aleksei Egorov & Daria Zinchenko & Oleg Leshukov, 2018.
"Universities’ Efficiency And Regional Economic Short-Run Growth: Empirical Evidence From Russia,"
HSE Working papers
WP BRP 203/EC/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
- Abankina, Irina & Aleskerov, Fuad & Belousova, Veronika & Gokhberg, Leonid & Kiselgof, Sofya & Petrushchenko, Vsevolod & Shvydun, Sergey & Zinkovsky, Kirill, 2016.
"From equality to diversity: Classifying Russian universities in a performance oriented system,"
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 228-239.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2013:i:2:p:15-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.