IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2006i1p328-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students' Strategies of Receiving Higher Education in the Context of the Bologna Process (on the example of SU-HSE)

Author

Listed:
  • Tatyana Baranova
  • Yuliya Muratova
  • Yuliya Ovchinnikova

Abstract

The problems that Russian colleges face when they change to the "Bachelor Studies + Master Studies" system from the traditional 5-year cycle is usually analyzed from the viewpoint of the organization of the educational process. This article attempts to consider this same problem from a student's standpoint. Empirical material collected in the Higher School of Economics showed that the strategies adopted by students (their choice of final degree) differ depending on the year of studies and the faculty where they study. However, interest is shown not to the entire system, but rather only to the Masters program, as students believe Bachelors diplomas not to be sufficient for the job market. The readiness of students to integrate into a unified European educational space is largely influenced by how well they are informed about the changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatyana Baranova & Yuliya Muratova & Yuliya Ovchinnikova, 2006. "Students' Strategies of Receiving Higher Education in the Context of the Bologna Process (on the example of SU-HSE)," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 328-346.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2006:i:1:p:328-346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2006:i:1:p:328-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.