IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2005i2p248-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Materials of the discussion about the final examination of high school students (RPCDE, April 13, 2005)

Author

Listed:
  • -

Abstract

How to stop reporting false grades on final examinations is one of the most complicated problems of our education. A discussion at a meeting of the Russian Public Council on the Development of Education (RPCDE) is perhaps the first professional discussion of this serious problem, which has both moral and socio-political aspects. Why do teachers choose to falsify the results of their own work, why are students unable to become sufficiently proficient in the state curriculum? Is the latter too complicated or too far removed from real life? Do these problems exist in other countries, and how are they solved? What role can the USE (Unified State Exam) and education reform as a whole play in overcoming this problem? These and other questions related to the final examination of high school students were the subject of the discussion at the RPCDE.

Suggested Citation

  • -, 2005. "Materials of the discussion about the final examination of high school students (RPCDE, April 13, 2005)," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 248-268.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2005:i:2:p:248-268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    educational reforms; unified state exam;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2005:i:2:p:248-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.