IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2020id2789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk assessment of public-private partnership in Russia based on the fuzzy logic method

Author

Listed:
  • A. N. Savrukov
  • N. Т. Savrukov
  • E. A. Kozlovskaya

Abstract

This paper is the first to assess the integral level of risks in public-private partnership (PPP) projects being implemented in Russia, taking into account the stages of project implementation. The results of empirical assessments have shown that the aggregate risk level is now estimated by experts as high. The key risks are incorrect assessment of project parameters, possible change of tariffs as well as risks related to the construction stage and demand for services. The majority of risk factors in PPP projects are of sectoral, project-level nature and are not related to economic, political or legal conditions. The study has shown differences in the structure of risks that partnership subjects are willing to take and transfer to another party, which has allowed to justify the distribution of risks among participants.

Suggested Citation

  • A. N. Savrukov & N. Т. Savrukov & E. A. Kozlovskaya, 2020. "Risk assessment of public-private partnership in Russia based on the fuzzy logic method," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2020:id:2789
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-10-132-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/2789/2317
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-10-132-143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2020:id:2789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.