IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprec/y2016id223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the methodology of institutional studies (To the 80th anniversary of Ronald Coase’s "Nature of the Firm")

Author

Listed:
  • A. Shastitko

Abstract

The paper deals with the comparative analysis of discrete institutional alternatives operationalized by referring to institutional design on different levels of interaction between economic agents and their groups. Theoretical differences between an institutional set of economic exchanges and an institutional boundaryof exchanges has been accounted for, as well as the differences between compensating and eliminating the failures of institutional arrangements used to organize economic exchange. Three examples illustrating the proposed research approach are analyzed: contracting on large diameter pipes for PJSC "Gazprom" infrastructure projects; contracting in the area of commercial real estate renting with "currency component"; the choice of mechanisms of governance for companies on highly concentrated markets with significant double-sided switching cost.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Shastitko, 2016. "On the methodology of institutional studies (To the 80th anniversary of Ronald Coase’s "Nature of the Firm")," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 8.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2016:id:223
    DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2016-8-96-119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/viewFile/223/223
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-8-96-119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprec:y:2016:id:223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NEICON (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.vopreco.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.